Dempster's Rule as Seen by Little Colored Balls
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dempster’s rule is traditionally interpreted as an operator for fusing belief functions. While there are different types of belief fusion, there has been considerable confusion regarding the exact type of operation that Dempster’s rule performs. Many alternative operators for belief fusion have been proposed, where some are based on the same fundamental principle as Dempster’s rule, and others have a totally different basis, such as the cumulative and averaging fusion operators. In this article we analyze Dempster’s rule from a statistical and frequentist perspective and compare it with cumulative and averaging belief fusion. We prove, and illustrate by examples on colored balls, that Dempster’s rule in fact represents a method for serial combination of stochastic constraints. Consequently, Dempster’s rule is not a method for cumulative fusion of belief functions under the assumption that subjective beliefs are an extension of frequentist beliefs. Having identified the true nature of Dempster’s rule, appropriate applications of Dempster’s rule of combination are described such as the multiplication of orthogonal belief functions, and the combination of preferences dictated by different parties.
منابع مشابه
The Combination of Di erent Pieces of Evidence Using Incidence
Combining multiple sources of informationis a major and diicult task in the management of uncertainty. Dempster's combination rule is one of the attractive approaches. However, many researchers have pointed out that the application domains of the rule are rather limited and it sometimes gives unexpected results. In this paper, we have further explored the nature of combination and achieved the ...
متن کاملEvidential Reasoning in a Categorial Perspective: Conjunction and Disjunction of Belief Functions
The categorial approach to evidential reasoning can be seen as a combination of the probability kinematics approach of Richard Jeffrey (1965) and the maximum (cross-) entropy inference approach of E. T. Jaynes (1957). As a consequence of that viewpoint, it is well known that category theory provides natural definitions for logical connectives. In particular, disjunction and conjunction are mode...
متن کاملRule for U p d a t i n g Evidence
Abstrac t . In probabilistic reasoning when we have to build a probability distribution on some events and no further information is available, we then apply the insufficient reasoning principle; i.e. we assume that the events have equal opportunities to occur. In our previous work we have observed that in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence the principle is not applied when using Dempster's...
متن کاملDeriving And Combining Continuous Possibility Functions in the Framework of Evidential Reasoning
To develop an approach to utilizing continuous statistical information within the Dempster- Shafer framework, we combine methods proposed by Strat and by Shafero We first derive continuous possibility and mass functions from probability-density functions. Then we propose a rule for combining such evidence that is simpler and more efficiently computed than Dempster's rule. We discuss the relatio...
متن کاملSensitivity of Combination Schemes under Conflicting Conditions and a New Method
In the theory of evidential reasoning, Dempster's rule is used for combining belief functions based on independent evidences. There has been a lot of debate over the counter-intuitive nature of results obtained by this rule [4, 8, 14, 15]. Dubois and Prade [1, 3] have shown that Dempster's rule is not robust and is sensitive to inaccurate estimates of uncertainty values. Many authors have sugge...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Computational Intelligence
دوره 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012